<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sovereignty Act: Rubbish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html</link>
	<description>Conservative Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 21:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kris</title>
		<link>http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html/comment-page-1#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s bad enough the Government is tinkering with the Constitution - but now the Opposition?

Dominick Grieve knows better. Or at least he should.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad enough the Government is tinkering with the Constitution &#8211; but now the Opposition?</p>
<p>Dominick Grieve knows better. Or at least he should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html/comment-page-1#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 19:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>Also, ever since the Factortame case the ECJ and UK courts have said that in areas of Community competence, UK courts can overrule Acts or reinterpret them in line with EC law. So there are basically two classes of Act, those that are constitutional and those which are not and which can be overruled or reinterpreted. Unless the Sovereignty Act explicitly states that it has supremacy over the 1974 Communities Act, it will just get reinterpreted along with everything else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, ever since the Factortame case the ECJ and UK courts have said that in areas of Community competence, UK courts can overrule Acts or reinterpret them in line with EC law. So there are basically two classes of Act, those that are constitutional and those which are not and which can be overruled or reinterpreted. Unless the Sovereignty Act explicitly states that it has supremacy over the 1974 Communities Act, it will just get reinterpreted along with everything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Sovereignty Act: Rubbish — Benjamin Gray -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html/comment-page-1#comment-1063</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Sovereignty Act: Rubbish — Benjamin Gray -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benjamin-gray.com/2009/11/sovereignty-act-rubbish.html#comment-1063</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Benjamin Gray, Benjamin Gray. Benjamin Gray said: [Ben Gray] Sovereignty Act: Rubbish http://bit.ly/1U6s9f [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Benjamin Gray, Benjamin Gray. Benjamin Gray said: [Ben Gray] Sovereignty Act: Rubbish <a href="http://bit.ly/1U6s9f" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/1U6s9f</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
